Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results
On 25/01/08 at 18:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > On 25/01/08 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> [docbok-xsl-doc-html]
> > But if the size is the same, why would the Installed-Size differ? I have
> > no idea. I've copied the source and the binary packages to
> > gluck:~lucas/docbook-xsl.{normal,bdfh}, if you want to have a look.
>
> Hm. Checked this too, but didn't find any difference. I also checked `du
> -s -k .' for the contents of data.tar.gz and control.tar.gz and there I
> also cannot find a difference. Maybe a call of `du -a' or a `find .
> -printf "%p %s\n" | sort' or similar before dpkg-gencontrol could help
> to track down the difference. Could it be a file-system related result,
> that du calculates different sizes?
That's possible, the builds were not done on the same filesystem (I used
LVM snapshots in a loop-mounted file for the dirty chroot).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: