On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 15:53:05 +0100 Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:42:03PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > nocheck | notest should also be supported whether or not the package is > > > actually being cross-built. emdebuild currently passes 'nocheck' as > > > part of the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS for all Emdebian builds. > > > > Imho this should be either nocheck or notest, supporting both is a bit > > pointless. Using notest or nocheck is also pretty useful for debugging > > purposes, if you don't need a lengthy test but want to have a new build > > fast. > > I think all the toolchain packages use nocheck - at least binutils, > glibc and gcc do (I filed bugs for a couple of them). > > I wanted to get around to introduce nocheck in a couple more packages, > but maybe it's better to just settle on it now and propose it for policy > inclusion for lenny. Excellent. I'll sort out the bug report. > Which package is using notest? Last I looked perl had a non-standard > way (x-no-test or so) and I filed a bug to change that to nocheck as > well. (Sure I've seen notest somewhere but can't find it now). > > So let's agree on nocheck? Agreed. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpoww1mJaKMc.pgp
Description: PGP signature