On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:46:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:08:40AM +1000, Anthony Towns a ?crit : > > For what it's worth, we don't do that. References I'm aware of: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/05/msg00092.html > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/05/msg00149.html > Hi Anthony, > thank for the links. So in the end, am I right to say that, since the > point of view of the FTP team is that RFC are software, orig.tar.gz > files which contain them fail to comply the DFSG and therefore are not > accepted in main? It's not my POV that RFCs are "software", no :) It is the POV of ftpmaster that everything in main, whether it be a .deb, .tar.gz or .diff.gz needs to meet the DFSG though. As you can probably tell from the second link above, I'm not personally very invested in having .orig.tar.gz's be pristine versus removing unused non-free stuff from them, but the position we've taken in the past has been to insist on it being removed, and I think it's worth being consistent. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature