Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
Quoting "Leo \"costela\" Antunes" <costela@debian.org>:
> Please note that I don't personally like Qmail either, but I still think
> we should (but don't *have* to) provide it, if possible (I don't know
> what's the outcome of the "putting it in public domain" story).
Why was it removed from Debian GNU/Linux in the first place!?
And when? I didn't even know that it was gone untill I saw this thread.
Although I don't use the official package (I need the LDAP patches),
my own packages is based on the official package though...
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "John H. Robinson, IV" <jaqque@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "Leo \"costela\" Antunes" <costela@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "Leo \"costela\" Antunes" <costela@debian.org>