Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> There are *way* better MTAs [than qmail] out there that dont need
>> tons of patches applied just to fulfill basic requirements for a MTA.
>
> No, there are not.
There are certainly many others that don't need patches to fulfill basic
requirements for an MTA, but whether they are better or not is
irrelevant for us, given Qmail's level of widespread adoption. There's
no discussion that there are still many people interested in having it
available.
After all, it's not like it's a 100 line C program with 10 totally
compatible alternatives... unfortunately! :-)
Cheers.
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "John H. Robinson, IV" <jaqque@debian.org>
- Prev by Date:
Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- Next by Date:
Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- Previous by thread:
Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- Next by thread:
Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- Index(es):