Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> There are certainly many others that don't need patches to fulfill basic
> requirements for an MTA, but whether they are better or not is
> irrelevant for us, given Qmail's level of widespread adoption.
How widespread is this anyway? I hardly see any new qmail installations
anymore, and the ones I see are largely because it's a pain to migrate away
from.
Of course, the plural of “anecdote” is not “data”...
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "John H. Robinson, IV" <jaqque@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "Leo \"costela\" Antunes" <costela@debian.org>