Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
On Dec 21, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> How widespread is this anyway? I hardly see any new qmail installations
> anymore, and the ones I see are largely because it's a pain to migrate away
> from.
Just one word: plesk.
And yes, I'd like myself as well to see qmail die the horrible death it
deserves. Whoever will package it please be sure that it will respect
the FHS and be patched to not be a backscatter cannon.
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "John H. Robinson, IV" <jaqque@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "Leo \"costela\" Antunes" <costela@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>