Re: Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
> Sune Vuorela <Sune@vuorela.dk> wrote:
> > I have read quite some bug scripts today. I am kind of wondering (maybe jsut
> > my imagination being limited) why you aren't just unconditionally including
> > those data instead of having a interactive bug script?
> I think it is only polite to ask before including a sources list into a
> public bug report that identifies the email address of the reporter -
> who knows what unofficial repos are out there.
Seems like the "sensitive data" use case, for which a central flag
(how exactly will have to be determined) should be set by the package,
and the reportbug* tool should communicate that to the user.
> The script does remind the user that any content can be edited before
> sending the report.
That should be done by the reportbug* tool if the above is done.