[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Neil Williams wrote:

> Well, for my own needs, emdebian-tools and apt-cross. Every bug report
> against apt-cross would have benefited from getting answers to the
> questions that are now deployed in the bug script (that is why the
> questions are in the bug script). It is vital to me that the user
> provides the full apt sources list (including sources in
> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*) because problems with apt-cross are (or
> certainly were until dpkg-cross 2.0.0) nearly always related to the
> particular sources used to generate the cache. Similarly with
> emdebian-tools, bug reports make absolutely no sense unless I get
> sources data and debconf data.

I have read quite some bug scripts today.  I am kind of wondering (maybe jsut 
my imagination being limited) why you aren't just unconditionally including 
those data instead of having a interactive bug script?

> 106 directories on my system - a lot are tex based.

The tex ones should in my opinion be changed to be non-interactive. But 
instead use presubj + script.

(I have today filed 3 bugs about making some bug scripts non-interactive - 
first one already fixed)

I'm not able to open the parallel memory address, how does it work?

You neither can ever send to the FPU, nor should ever disable the password on 
a port 3 for getting access over a line of a button over a 54-bit provider.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: