Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Are the @Base in these files really necessary ?
With the current code, IIRC yes.
> I mean, most packages have no symbol versioning and thus use the "Base"
> version. Does it work without it being explicitly put ?
> If not, don't you think it would make sense ?
Maybe, someone else already made the remark, but I like when things are
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :