On 11208 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote: > - despite the absence of latex sources one is allowed to take a > html, pdf or ps editor and modify the old documentation in the > .orig.tar.gz under the terms of the LGPL; "Despite the absence of c source one is allowed to take a .so file and a editor[1] and modify the program in the .orig.tar.gz under the terms of the LGPL". [1] whatever you prefer to edit binaries directly Not good. :) > - the content of the source-orphan files is available in another source > format which could be used to generate equivalent documents that > would only differ by their formatting; > could such a package be qualified for the main archive? If you drop upstreams .ps/.pdf files and then just ship yours - thats fine. Best thing of course is upstream shipping the right source. -- bye Joerg <liw> HE, we had sex in Debian for many years, yes, before I put a stop to it
Attachment:
pgp4FiKyB75QT.pgp
Description: PGP signature