Re: Enabling and installing of "risky" ("patented") codecs - madeeasy
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Sam Morris:
> > I don't see why users in countries where software is not patentable
> > should be forced to jump through hoops to get access to multimedia
> > software. If this repository is not added to the user's sources.list
> > file by default then there is no advantage in setting up yet another
> > repository for such software.
> AFAICT the non-free repository isn't added either. Only main and contrib
But why would perfectly free software be out of Debian because of a broken
patent system? AFAICT, non-us was still debian, and so this non-pat thing
should be too.