On Fri Oct 19, 2007 at 17:36:21 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Allow me to point out the message at > <http://blog.steve.org.uk/articles/2007/10/19/as-i-move-on-through-the-year> > which is really a Bits from the Security Team. > > Why is - once again - a message that I'd consider appropriate for d-d, or > perhaps even d-d-a (though I admit that the real information content is not > extremely high. But still, it is information that Steve is active and > outlines some of the problems and ways how people can help) hidden on a > blog? I don't believe that post contains significant new information, (except that I like pies!), and as such I didn't believe it deserved massive visibility. To be honest I'm a little disappointed that you chose to complain here about that, rather than commenting/mailing me personally. > (Apologies if I'm just too quick and Steve posted his Bits to d-d or d-d-a > but the mail just hasn't reached me or the mail archives yet.) It hasn't been posted elsewhere. I'm happy to write more, later, and post to the devel-announc list, once I've got a chance to do so. But even so the content would be largely known, and largely un-newsworthy. And to reiterate things slightly; If there were something that users/developers are supposed to know then it shouldn't be posted to just a random blog. It should go to the development/announcement lists. I don't believe I'm guilty of that here, and I don't believe anybody else has been guilty of that recently. (ie. I agree. Fragmentation is something to be avoided). Steve -- http://www.steve.org.uk/
Attachment:
pgp8I3M5wHhgI.pgp
Description: PGP signature