Re: libdb4.* madness in unstable
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:52:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> That's equivalent to an indefinite quarantine; according to BDB upstream,
> OpenLDAP's problems with various versions are a consequence of abusing the
> interface, not of using "advanced features". I'm not sure why the burden
> here should be on BDB alone.
>
That remembers me some other cases where people insist to use a non
stable C++ API instead of the C one. One could ask himself who is
guilty: the upstream who releases as public his private functions,
or developer who use them ? :-D
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: