Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file
Ben Finney writes ("Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file"):
> I argue that the only fair place to draw the line is "valid RFC 2821
> email address". The alternative is to leave it to ongoing subjective
> judgement of unspecified Debian parties as to which addresses make
> sense or not â?? or to avoid the question of valid contact information
> altogether, as seems to be current practice.
Yes, and that current practice is just fine.
The whole point of having human beings do packaging is so that we can
apply our judgement, interpersonal skills, and so forth.