Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom
John Kelly <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:41:29 +0000 (UTC), Sune Vuorela
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>On 2007-09-12, John Kelly <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> "Distribution of this memo is unlimited."
>>> With RFCs available to anyone with a web browser, it's absurd to say
>>> they're non-free, and a waste of time removing them from Debian.
>>eh? whattabout modification? and distribution of modified versions?
> This is where it gets absurd.
> They're RFCs. They're not code.
For the social contract and dfsg that is irelevant. The contract does
NOT say Debian will have 100% free source code with some non-free
other things mixed in.
> If you want to "modify" an RFC, you have to write your own and submit
> it, see?