Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:56:20 +0200, "Miriam Ruiz"
>2007/9/12, Raphael Hertzog <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> > 2007/9/12, John Kelly <email@example.com>:
>> > > An obsession with "freedom" that insists on removing RFCs from source
>> > > tarballs, is absurd. Why not change the contract.
>> > You're not talking seriously, are you?
>> Why not? Is it difficult to acknowledge that not all people think the
>> same? Have you noticed that none of the GR end up with 100% on one side
>> and 0% on the other?
>So, what exact change in the social contract are you proposing?
From a random RFC: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2060.txt
"Distribution of this memo is unlimited."
With RFCs available to anyone with a web browser, it's absurd to say
they're non-free, and a waste of time removing them from Debian.
If people need that spelled out in a contract, then spell it out in a
way that can't be misconstrued.