[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:17:57 -0500, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> said: 


> On 09/13/07 02:45, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007 à 16:51 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
>>> It often start with "GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE" and it' clearly
>>> written: " Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim
>>> copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed."
>>> Shouldn't we garantee the right for our users to modify LICENCEs ??
>> This common belief that the GPL text itself is non-free is unfounded.
>> Can I modify the GPL and make a modified license?  You can use the
>> GPL terms (possibly modified) in another license provided that you
>> call your license by another name and do not include the GPL
>> preamble, and provided you modify the instructions-for-use at the end
>> enough to make it clearly different in wording and not mention GNU
>> (though the actual procedure you describe may be similar).
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifyGPL

> Paraphrasing Luk Claes:
>     besides we as Debian only want our users the freedom to be able to
>     if they wanted it, to willy-nilly modify the GPL text.

        They can, as long as they publish it under a new name.

> Quoting Mirim Ruiz:
>     What about ... changing the format or structure for clarifying, or
>     even fixing typos?

        Sure, as long as you change the name of the result and call it
 Rons General Public License.

        There is also a pragmatic distinction: License textsembody the
 permission under which we can distribute the software; RFC's do not.
 We can't retroactively change the license terms we distribute the
 software under; so hacking up a license, under law, would mean we can
 not distribute the result.  That one point of law makes a critical,
 pragmatic difference; so a Work, and the terms of the licesne which
 grants us the right to modify and distribute the work, have to be
 treated differently -- or else we have no distribution.

If life is merely a joke, the question still remains: for whose
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: