Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom
On 11140 March 1977, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>> I don't consider it something needing fixing.
>> It is a good way to have the copyright files occasionally reviewed.
> I don't think that old source packages are re-reviewed for copyright
> violations/non-freeness. But I could easily be wrong.
Those that pass NEW for whatever reason are reviewed. Yes, I did reject
lots of such packages for copyright-file brokenness. :)
"If un-free is black and free is white, then there
are degrees of free-ness as there are shades of gray."