Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007 à 04:19 -0500, Ron Johnson a écrit : > Except for "fixing typos", none of what you seem to propose seems > to my humble eyes to be modifying the base document. Give the new > document a derived name, indicating the changes. Inside the > document, clearly define what changes you've made to the base document. Sorry, but the license doesn't allow that. > Bottom line: being able to willy-nilly change protocol specification > base documents seems, to me, to be One *Stupid* Idea. A license requiring modified versions to be clearly marked as such, with a changed name, would definitely be considered free, and still wouldn't encourage such practice. Not being able to draft derived versions of specifications is another plain stupid idea. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=