Re: conflicting gssapi libraries
Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Persuade Heimdal upstream to provide an soname that uniquely identifies
> this library in the face of other, pre-existing libgssapi packages, and
> barring that, add a Debian-specific soname component to it?
That's a bit unfair to Heimdal given that their GSSAPI library predates
the UMich library by many years.
> Or if the libraries are actually fully ABI-compatible, perhaps the two
> packages could have the same Provides that could be used in the shlibs?
This may work. They both implement the same standard. Although they're
not *fully* ABI-compatible, since Heimdal exposes some additional symbols
that are useful for users who are doing Kerberos, so it probably won't
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>