On Jul 29, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > Isn't openbsd-inetd priority:standard? That's enough to make the > real-package unnecessary, afaik (and that lets the default inetd be > changed simply by changing the priorities of the packages, rather than > the dependencies of lots of packages). Maybe, but I have never heard of this exception to the rule. It could also be argued that it's time to demote *inetd packages as optional. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature