Re: Intention to drop sparc32 support for Lenny
>>>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de> writes:
Uwe> OK, not being a SPARC expert myself, I'd still like to see a
Uwe> list of issues or bugs which are worth dropping a whole
Uwe> sub-architecture.
Well, if I remember correctly, it was the kernel that was the problem.
There is no support for sparc32 in the kernel any more. Or at least,
no major development....
So the primary thing is to be the upstream maintainer for the sparc32
kernel port...
Uwe> Well, I just saw three or more sparc32 patches being
Uwe> committed to Linus' git tree today or yesterday, so that may
Uwe> not be quite correct.
Apparently that is not enough. There is no maintainer for it (that
I know of).
--
Albanian subway Panama Nazi radar Cuba nitrate 747 $400 million in
gold bullion nuclear Legion of Doom munitions class struggle
arrangements SEAL Team 6
[See http://www.echelonwatch.org/ for more about this]
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/09/06/eu_releases_echelon_spying_report/
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/23989res20060131.html#echelon
Reply to: