Re: Mass bug filing: Dependency/file list predictability
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:37:55PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Didn't mean to sound accusatory - more surprised. It was strange that
> one package is commonly affected and others that also changed versions
> were not. Maybe something to do with pattern matching failing when a
> version includes dfsg or similar alpha characters.
Or simply because this affected only the last few days or building or so. :-)
I've started rebuilding the 472 packages now, and it seems that slightly
under half of the bugs are bogus. Expect a new list tomorrow :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: