Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Or are you questioning that most libraries ought to be using version
> scripts? I said they ought to, not that they currently did; and using
Yeah, that. Apparently my english failed me, and I didn't parse what you
meant correctly.
I am all for symbol versioning.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: "Bernhard R. Link" <brlink@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>