[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta



On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:55:43 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:55:18PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:30:36 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > And I mean, I know what a GR is for, why are you telling me? It's
> > > still not a *good solution* for deciding these things; it's a last
> > > resort, and the only other options we currently have a "ftpmaster
> > > decides" and "it's obvious to pretty much everybody".
> > I'm rather surprised to hear you saying that, since you seem to have
> > been the proposer of GR-2006-001...
> 
> Sometimes you have to choose the best of a lot of bad options. When
> that happens, it's often good to spend some time trying to get better
> options for the future.

Could you please elaborate?
I'm not sure I understand correctly: are you saying that you are unhappy
with how GR-2006-001 worked out and that you are looking for better
strategies for similar situations?

-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
 Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpvx7rKP2FrH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: