debian-devel re-added. On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:40:36PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:50:15 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:54:36AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > and to the best of my knowledge, works licensed solely under the > > > CDDL have never been accepted in main.[1] > > star | 1.5a57-1 | oldstable | source, alpha, arm, [...] > > star | 1.5a67-1 | stable | source, alpha, amd64, [...] > > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/star/star_1.5a57-1/star.copyright > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350624 > Quoting from the bug log, Anthony Towns wrote: > | The CDDL mightn't be the best license in the world, and isn't GPL > | compatible, but it's still DFSG-free. Closing this bug with this > | message. > I do *not* agree that the CDDL meets the DFSG, especially when a choice > of venue is in place. That a poster to debian-legal doesn't think a license meets the DFSG isn't particularly useful information, and is even less so when that poster isn't a DD, a maintainer or someone in the n-m queue. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature