Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#425381: (Re: digikam: 0.9.2~beta1-2 uninstallable on amd64)
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:10:05AM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Thus on amd64 digikam depends on libkexiv2-1 and conflicts with
> > > libexiv2-0.12, but libkexiv2-1 depends on libexiv2-0.12.
> > Why does it need to conflict?
> The conflict was done to prevent the situation where:
> digikam was linked against libexiv2-1, but kipi-plugins was linked against
> libexiv2-0.12
> which seems to crash..
Ok, so a workaround for lack of symbol versioning in libexiv2.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: