Re: svn-buildpackage etc., mergeWithUpstream, and dpatch/quilt/cdbs again
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I have now. IIUC, it lets you group and name diffs vs. a particular state
> of the source code, but the end result is a normal .diff.gz, meaning that
> everyone else has to use stgit too to get all the benefits, right?
Yes. People working on the same project team should use the same tools
anyway. For external people, such as when sending patches upstream, it is
trivial to extract patches.
It wouldn't be difficult to hack up a web frontend that presents the patches
in a nice way. Don't know if it exist already.