Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian (reduced false positives)
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:36 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:02:16 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I have updated the list to hide packages with identical upstream
> > version numbers but with different epochs. This might hide some
> > real positives but most likely hides more false positives.
> I suggest to take into account experimental, too. Some examples
> randomly taken...
I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental,
but that is not a high priority to me because this does not change that
Debian Unstable is outdated for the listed packages. Still, thanks for
this good suggestion, and I'll consider to add that column for
experimental to make the report more complete.