[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: many rejects (Re: Second call for votes for the debian project leader election 2007)

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:02:49 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> said: 

> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:23:38 +0200, Michal Čihař <michal@cihar.com>
> said:
>> Hi On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:23:28 +0200
>> Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> wrote:

>>> If you encrypt to yourself, how is the voting system supposed to
>>> decrypt it?

>> It was encrypted for two keys, both of them can decrypt it.

>         It turns out that it was indeed encrypted, but the message
>         was
>  not signed; which means there is no information about who is
>  sending the ballot. This is a legitimate addition to the ballot;
>  I'll point it out in the next CFV.

        Hmm. Turns out, that ballot already mentioned that "you may, if
 you wish, choose to send a signed, encrypted ballot".   The operative
 word is "signed", which the ballot in question was not.

No matter how good she looks, some other guy is sick and tired of
putting up with her shit.  Men's Room, Linda's Bar and Grill.  Chapel
Hill, North Carolina.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: