[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Second call for votes for the debian project leader election 2007

Kalle Kivimaa <killer@debian.org> writes:

> Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> writes:
>> With Gnus+Mailcrypt, I was unable to vote with a signed but not
>> encrypted ballot.  The voting daemon claimed that there was some
>> kind of quoted-printable problem.  This surprised me: Gnus and
>> Mailcrypt have not caused problems for me with any previous
>> votes.  However, this is the only ballot I recall containing
>> non-ASCII characters, which could be the cause.
> As I used to have all my outgoing emails default to ISO 8859-1 charset
> I was unable to vote with Gnus+Mailcrypt until I changed the default
> to be ASCII. So, as I now had that same problem again, I'm guessing
> the problem is with Raphaël's non-ASCII e+umlaut, which makes Gnus use
> quoted-printable, which then isn't valid as seen by devotee (I'm
> guessing that Gnus encodes the signed mail and devotee wants to
> verify before decoding).

Mailcrypt doesn't, as far as I know, support PGP/MIME (RFC 3156).
PGP/MIME is the only standards-conforming way to do OpenPGP signatures
containing non-ASCII text.  Check your e-mail if it contains a
top-level Content-Type of multipart/signed.  If it doesn't, you used
the vanilla inline OpenPGP type.

Btw, an old rant on this topic:


In recent Gnus versions, PGP/MIME is supported natively.


Attachment: pgp_c5F6zC_Ri.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: