[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Changelog not signed by "human"



Hello,

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > uploads are signed and that I am just being paranoid!
> 
> Since the buildd host generates the changelog entry, it's only natural
> that it's also the buildd host which is listed in the changelog entry.

Thanks for the explanation.

There was one other question in my mail. (Sorry! I know I should have split
it up.)

> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > which contained the following changelog entry:
> > 
> > 	screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low
> > 
> > 	  * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes.
> > 	  * Rebuild to fix a bug of indeterminate origin that causes screen to switch
> > 
> > 	     -- Debian/i386 Build Daemon <buildd_i386-saens>  Tue,  6 Mar 2007 17:06:12 -0600
> > 
> > I saw two somewhat suspicious aspects to this. 
> > 	(a) The second sentence in the changelog appears to be
> > 	incomplete.

I could make no sense out of the second line of the changelog
entry. "[The] bug [...] causes screen to switch" seems to be an
incomplete sentence. I would have liked to ask the relevant developer
for clarification but I didn't know where to look; which is why I
posted my other question.

Sorry for being a pest.

Thanks and regards,

Kapil.
--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: