Re: Where did Bacula 1.38.11-7+b1 come from?
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:31:46PM +0100, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
>> On Thursday 22 February 2007 19:26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> > 1. Add a Build-dependency on dpkg-dev (>=1.13.19)
>> > 2. For all in bacula-foo packages that are arch:all replace any
>> > occurence of
>> > Depends: bacula-foo (= ${Source-Version})
>> > with Depends: bacula-foo (= ${source:Version})
>> > 3. (optional, but clarify things) For all in bacula-foo packages that
>> > are arch:any replace any occurence of
>> > Depends: bacula-foo (= ${Binary-Version})
>> Something is missing here... I suspect:
>> | with Depends: bacula-foo (= ${binary:Version})
> That would be
> bacula-foo (>= ${source:Version}), bacula-foo (<< ${source:Version}.1~)
I do not get that, what is the benefit compared to (= ${binary:Version})
besides being impossible to read?
cu andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
Reply to: