[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Where did Bacula 1.38.11-7+b1 come from?



On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:31:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 22 February 2007 19:26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > 1. Add a Build-dependency on dpkg-dev (>=1.13.19)
> > 2. For all in bacula-foo packages that are arch:all replace any
> > occurence of
> > Depends: bacula-foo (= ${Source-Version})
> > with Depends: bacula-foo (= ${source:Version})
> > 3. (optional, but clarify things) For all in bacula-foo packages that
> > are arch:any replace any occurence of
> > Depends: bacula-foo (= ${Binary-Version})
> 
> Something is missing here... I suspect:
> | with Depends: bacula-foo (= ${binary:Version})
> 
> ... but feel free to correct me.

I think I am understanding what is going on here, but I think it is
incomplete.

There are these situations in bacula:

1) Arch all deps on arch all with the same version
2) Arch any deps on arch all with the same version
3) Arch all deps on arch any with the same version

I think that the above handle cases 1 and 2, but not case 3.  Actually I
don't think it's possible to make case 3 binNMU-safe, or am I missing
something?



Reply to: