[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Handling of (inactive) Debian Accounts

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:42:47 -0500, Joe Smith
<unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com> said:  

> I would hope that there would be a grace period after deactivation,

        I suggest you read the original mail before participating in
 the discussion.

> where a person who misses the WaT mail, and then later has his/her
> account disabled can quickly speak up and say they are still here,
> and be re-enabled without having to go through any sort of NM
> process.

        Now, while having a grqace period sounds like a good idea,
 this appeal is couched in terms that seem (to me, at least) shrouded
 in fear of _any_ NM processing. Why is that? I mean, getting ones
 status reverted is an inconvenience, but surely an active DD should
 not be afraid of passing something we ask of every new developer?

Make a wish, it might come true.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: