Re: Handling of (inactive) Debian Accounts
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:42:47 -0500, Joe Smith
<unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com> said:
> I would hope that there would be a grace period after deactivation,
I suggest you read the original mail before participating in
the discussion.
> where a person who misses the WaT mail, and then later has his/her
> account disabled can quickly speak up and say they are still here,
> and be re-enabled without having to go through any sort of NM
> process.
Now, while having a grqace period sounds like a good idea,
this appeal is couched in terms that seem (to me, at least) shrouded
in fear of _any_ NM processing. Why is that? I mean, getting ones
status reverted is an inconvenience, but surely an active DD should
not be afraid of passing something we ask of every new developer?
manoj
--
Make a wish, it might come true.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: