On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:03:03AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I'm a member of the pkg-ruby-extras team. In this team, we use the > following scheme for the Maintainer and Uploaders fields: > Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact > point) > Uploaders: the team mailing list, + all the members of the team > (auto-generated using a cdbs rule) In the OCaml team we do the following: Maintainer: the team mailing list Uploaders: all the members of the team I actually want to change this policy so that Uploaders only list people who "cares" for a given package inside the team. A reasonable definition of "cares for" can be: have their name in the changelog of that package at least one time or something such. > This is not optimal: > - this generates very long DDPO pages, with lots of packages people > don't care about: > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net I do think this is an issue, but at a different level. The DDPO is already able to distinguish packages in which you're listed as an uploadeder, it shows them in blue. I think we need some more fine-grained filtering, like the following two: - please do not show me packages of which I'm just an uploaded - please do not show me packages team-maintained (that's of course a bit more tricky, since it requires team-knowledge for DDPO, but I think this kind of information would be useful elsewhere for QA purposes) > - it's difficult to keep track of who is caring for that package (hint: > QA, MIA, ...) Uh? Why? Your maintainer field seems to address this issue. In our scheme that's would be more a problem, but if the mailing list is responsive it's enough. Think for example at the debian-release mailing list: it's a list, but it's really responsive for all packages in the archive. So IMO not being able to identify a single person is not necessarily an indicator of unresponsiveness for a given package. > Shouldn't this be documented somewhere (developer's reference ?) ? I think we really need to document a best practice for this, thanks for bringing it up. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature