Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates
--- Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> escribió:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:02:16 +0100 (CET), Miriam Ruiz
> <little_miry@yahoo.es> said:
>
> > Anyway, I don't think that classification will fit Debian's
> > needs. It's self described as "sex of a subject for clinical
> > purposes, such as the selection of sex-based grown metrics". To
> > start with, it talks about sex, and not gender. Even more, I don't
> > think medical or clinical data should go into Debian's LDAP.
>
> Err, so now the specification of a binary gender field is
> unacceptable and confidential medical information that should be
> expunged from db.d.o?
Sorry? I guess you misundestood my mail. I was answering kev's suggestion
about the standard described at
http://medical.nema.org/Dicom/CP/CPack_23/cp373_lb.pdf
Miry
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es
Reply to: