Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:02:16 +0100 (CET), Miriam Ruiz
<little_miry@yahoo.es> said:
> Anyway, I don't think that classification will fit Debian's
> needs. It's self described as "sex of a subject for clinical
> purposes, such as the selection of sex-based grown metrics". To
> start with, it talks about sex, and not gender. Even more, I don't
> think medical or clinical data should go into Debian's LDAP.
Err, so now the specification of a binary gender field is
unacceptable and confidential medical information that should be
expunged from db.d.o?
manoj
incredulous
--
How much does she love you? Less than you'll ever know.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: