[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: restricted sourceless ARM uploads



On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:40:06PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Wookey a écrit :
> > On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
> >> started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
> >> [1].
> > 
> > Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss if there
> > is any significant reason not to use qemu 'machines' instead of actual
> > hardware for slower arches.
> > 
> 
> BTW, I don't think ARM needs emulated build machines. It's just that
> it's the fastest ARM machine I found. My two NSLU2 won't have been enough.
> 
> Also it seems the current ARM build machines altogether are fast enough
> to build all the packages (except for building big packages like the
> kernel). But a faster machine would mean that the Vancouver requirements
> are satisfied, and also less machines to handle, so less work for the
> ARM build daemon maintainer.
Hi *,
that brings up an interesting issue wrt the vancouver memorandum: it
didn't address software emulation or virtualization. Can qemu and xen be
shown to be reliable for buildd purposes? Does the aforementioned
document need to be modified for these?
cheers,
Kev
-- 
|  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |       my web site:       |
| : :' :      The  Universal     | debian.home.pipeline.com |
| `. `'      Operating System    | go to counter.li.org and |
|   `-    http://www.debian.org/ |    be counted! #238656   |
|     my keysever: pgp.mit.edu   |     my NPO: cfsg.org     |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: