On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:44:25PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:25, Berke Durak wrote: > > I will just say that in my opinion, a repository such as stable, > > testing or unstable should be self-contained. > For stable and testing that is true. However, sid is broken by design as > it will always receive new versions of packages first and basically > packages that depended on it can only be recompiled against the new > package (if needed) once it is in. That's true to a point -- but the weather analogy could still work, in that the "rainy" areas shouldn't move around the archive, not get stuck anywhere. It'd probably be interesting to get a general idea of any spots that have a climate that tends to be "wet" or "dry" too... I think different levels of bugs would probably be more useful than just installability checks though... Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature