[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hijacking ITA: sa-exim



Another three weeks have passed. I give Anand a last chance to respond as I at 
the same time CC mia@qa.debian.org.

On Friday 10 November 2006 13:23, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> sa-exim was [1]orphaned on February 12. Four days later, Anand Kumria
> announced his ITA, but he never completed the adoption and hasn't responded
> to several mails about the issue. He doesn't seem to be MIA though; he has
> uploaded at least one [2]package pretty recently. That was before I mailed
> him myself, though...
>
>  [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352533
>  [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk-gnutella.html
>
> Can I take this package anyway? I use it since I feel it still has
> something Exim's built-in "spam" ACL condition (also known as exiscan)
> doesn't offer; namely, more flexibility in the adding of X-Spam headers.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren@lysator.liu.se
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

Attachment: pgpP4Qg7XmWP0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: