Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?
On 10/28/06, David Nusinow <email@example.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:23:27PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Given you're talking about cgwd, you prolly mean beryl (nee
> compiz-quinnstorm) rather than the original compiz which is
> in Debian.
> The beryl packaging is being undertaken by the X Strike Force, who're
> also maintianing the compiz packages. So no problem yet, you're better
> of reading the debian-x list archives to discover why it's not shipped
> yet. (I believe they're doing an internal code-freeze for Etch, but I
> dunno if Beryl's in that freeze or not)
You're right about the internal code freeze, although I think beryl should
probably go in to unstable so we can start getting the packages out there.
According to Shawn, who's maintaining it for us, it's not stable enough to
release with Etch though, so seeing it there is pretty well out of the
question. The current set of beryl packages are in good shape, and are
sitting in our svn repo, although shawn hasn't finished packaging emerald
yet, which appears to be the missing piece.
If we're going to ship xorg with aiglx and composite enabled by
default (actually i dunno really), beryl in etch and in default
desktop environment (just listed not enabled by default) would be a
huge win, maybe it's too late now. I would like to point out this
My opinion is based as a beryl user in an ibook with 'heavily'
customized Debian and not so customized Ubuntu (just needed to push
beryl from 3rd party repository).
> As for cgwd, I presume that also became something in the beryl
> packages (beryl-manager?) and so is being packaged as part of the
> beryl packaging.
I don't know what cgwd is either, but I don't follow beryl at all at this
point, so I rely on Shawn to teach me those new acronyms. :-)
I guess this is somewhere in emerald (part of beryl) source. Btw,
we're talking about window decorators here.