Re: Alas for lilypond in etch
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:35:43PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Failing that, we can either remove lilypond 2.6 from etch, or not. I
> am happy to do what other people judge to be best, since nobody is
> generally happy with my own decisions here.
I would think it would be an _extremely_ bad idea to throw lilypond 2.6
out if 2.8 doesn't make it. It doesn't appear to be having any
outstanding RC-bugs currently anyway, so I don't see what the point
Is there any rationale posted somewhere for removing 2.6 in its current
state that I could read?
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22