Re: A plan to get rid of unnecessary package dependencies
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:28:50PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Christian Aichinger <Greek0@gmx.net> writes:
> > Maintaining such information somewhere within the library package would
> > be possible, but that sounds like a more complex plan, and I doubt that
> > many library maintainers know if their lib uses such tricks or not.
> does still apply.
As a first approximation perhaps libraries with constructors or
destructors could be assumed to always be required? That would be more
conservative than required but perhaps so conservative as to be useless.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Reply to: