On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:23:58AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I agree, but understand and accept that the license issues need to be > checked before it is accepted into debian. I understand that, but mplayer inclusion is a problem since I remember that mplayer exists. I really don't know what have to be checked and why it takes more than 4 years. Many people contributed much time to make mplayer ready to enter our archives and as far as I can see they are simply ignored. Please tell me what's wrong with *current* package and what can we do to make it better and stop saying me it's license issue. That's simply boring. Which part of mplayer is non-free for you? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fenio@debian.org | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:fenio@jabber.org | rlu:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature