[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

* Stefano Zacchiroli:

> As an answer specific for this case. The field is still an X- field,
> because I actually don't know how and if it should be standardized.

If you use the X- prefix and the field gains widespread acceptance, a
transition is needed.  Debian might be able to do this in a
coordinated manner, but usually, it's better to just omit the X-
prefix from the spart.

Reply to: