Re: (proposed) Mass bug filing?for debconf "abuse" by using low|medium priority debconf notes?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: (proposed) Mass bug filing?for debconf "abuse" by using low|medium priority debconf notes?
From: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 08:58:06 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060916065806.GA6528@nancy>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060914174153.GD15156@djedefre.onera>

> Debian logcheck Team <logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
>  logcheck-database -- config:17 logcheck-database/standard-rename-note

removed in svn, will disappear on next upload.

> Debian logcheck Team <logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
>  logcheck -- config:14 logcheck/install-note
>  logcheck -- config:17 logcheck/changes

first gone, second added retroactively to NEWS.

-- 
maks

Reply to:

References:
- (proposed) Mass bug filing for debconf "abuse" by using low|medium priority debconf notes?
  - From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#387693: ITP: myhdl -- Python module to use Python as a Hardware Description Language
Next by Date: preconfiguration fails, versioned dependency not satisfied
Previous by thread: Re: (proposed) Mass bug filing for debconf "abuse" by using low|medium priority debconf notes?
Next by thread: Re: (proposed) Mass bug filing for debconf "abuse" by using low|medium priority debconf notes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread