Re: (proposed) Mass bug filing for debconf "abuse" by using low|medium priority debconf notes?
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 19:41:53 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> As a conclusion and combining both, I would really like to unsderstand
> why so many fellow developers insist on using LOW priority NOTES in
> their debconf templates and use them in maintainer scripts.
> Packages with low priority debconf notes:
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
> fbset -- config:16 fbset/create_framebuffer_devices
As Mark Brown, I did that following the policy. I don't have any
problem removing it, but would be nice to get the policy fixed.
> xfstt -- config:13 xfstt/default_port_changed
Fixed in incoming.
> Packages with medium priority debconf notes:
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
> bochs -- config:10 bochs/bochsrc
Will be fixed with next upload.
regards,
guillem
Reply to: