also sprach Alexey Feldgendler <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2006.08.23.1610 +0100]: > I would add my thoughts there but currently I know nothing about netconf > beyond what's written on that page now. What is the scope of netconf? Is > it supposed to supersede ifupdown, supplement it, or be an alternative? Is > anything already implemented, or is it only an idea for now? It's an idea with the final goal to provide most of what ifupdown+guessnet+resolvconf do now, with better integration with wireless-tools/wpasupplicant and ifplugd, and a proper interface for user interfaces. A bit like network-manager, but done the Debian way. > Is there a reason to start developing a new tool instead of > enhancing ifupdown? Is there a reason to cling to ifupdown? netconf will be compatible. > >Can I forward your post to the netconf mailing list? > > Yes, you're welcome. I've just subscribed to that list, BTW. Mh, I don't have it anymore, of course. If you still do, please bounce it. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems drink canada dry! you might not succeed, but it *is* fun trying.
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)